| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/06/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/12/2017 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, B. P. L. da; KNACKFUSS, F. B.; LABARTHE, N.; ALMEIDA, F. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Bianca P. L. da Silva, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF); Fabiana B. Knackfuss, Universidade do Grande Rio; Norma Labarthe, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF); Flavya Mendes-de-Almeida, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). |
|
Título: |
Effect of a synthetic analogue of the feline facial pheromone on salivary cortisol levels in the domestic cat. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 3, p. 287-290, março 2017. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Efeito do análogo sintético do feromônio facial felino sobre o nível de cortisol salivar de gatosdomésticos. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a saliva collection device (Salivette®) to measure cortisol levels in saliva samples of domestic cats and to assess the effect of a synthetic analogue of the feline facial pheromone fraction F3 (Feliway®) on cortisol levels. A total of 28 domestic cats from a private high-quality sanctuary were sampled before exposure to the facial pheromone and after 35 days of exposure. Two pheromone devices were placed in the area where the animals ate to guarantee the exposure of all cats. The collecting device yielded a sufficient volume of saliva (>0.20mL) to allow cortisol measurement. Cortisol measurements ranged from 0.02g/dL to 0.16μg/dL, with a difference between before (42.1%) and after (62.6%) exposure to the pheromone (F=3.2351; p≤0.0002). No difference in cortisol levels was observed between before (x =0.078μg/dL) and after (x =0.066μg/dL) (t=1.79; p=0.08) exposure. However, salivary cortisol levels decreased in 75% (21/28) of the cats after exposure (x2=12.07; p=0.0005), suggesting that the animals have different susceptibilities to the pheromone or that they spent different lengths of time in the area where the pheromone devices were installed. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Enriquecimento ambiental; Estresse; Salivette; Welfare enhancement. |
|
Thesagro: |
Comportamento animal; Feromônio. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal stress; Behavior; Cats; Cortisol; Pheromones. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/161116/1/Effect-of-a-synthetic-analogue.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02249naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2071586
005 2017-12-29
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, B. P. L. da
245 $aEffect of a synthetic analogue of the feline facial pheromone on salivary cortisol levels in the domestic cat.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aTítulo em português: Efeito do análogo sintético do feromônio facial felino sobre o nível de cortisol salivar de gatosdomésticos.
520 $aThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of a saliva collection device (Salivette®) to measure cortisol levels in saliva samples of domestic cats and to assess the effect of a synthetic analogue of the feline facial pheromone fraction F3 (Feliway®) on cortisol levels. A total of 28 domestic cats from a private high-quality sanctuary were sampled before exposure to the facial pheromone and after 35 days of exposure. Two pheromone devices were placed in the area where the animals ate to guarantee the exposure of all cats. The collecting device yielded a sufficient volume of saliva (>0.20mL) to allow cortisol measurement. Cortisol measurements ranged from 0.02g/dL to 0.16μg/dL, with a difference between before (42.1%) and after (62.6%) exposure to the pheromone (F=3.2351; p≤0.0002). No difference in cortisol levels was observed between before (x =0.078μg/dL) and after (x =0.066μg/dL) (t=1.79; p=0.08) exposure. However, salivary cortisol levels decreased in 75% (21/28) of the cats after exposure (x2=12.07; p=0.0005), suggesting that the animals have different susceptibilities to the pheromone or that they spent different lengths of time in the area where the pheromone devices were installed.
650 $aAnimal stress
650 $aBehavior
650 $aCats
650 $aCortisol
650 $aPheromones
650 $aComportamento animal
650 $aFeromônio
653 $aEnriquecimento ambiental
653 $aEstresse
653 $aSalivette
653 $aWelfare enhancement
700 1 $aKNACKFUSS, F. B.
700 1 $aLABARTHE, N.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, F. M. de
773 $tPesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro$gv. 37, n. 3, p. 287-290, março 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
KOTHARI, K.; BATTISTI, R.; BOOTE, K. J.; ARCHONTOULIS, S. V.; CONFALONE, A.; CONSTANTIN, J.; CUADRA, S. V.; DEBAEKE, P.; FAYE, B.; GRANT, B.; HOOGENBOOM, G.; JING, Q.; VAN DER LAAN, M.; SILVA, F. A. M. da; MARIN, F. R.; NEHBANDANI, A.; NENDEL, C.; PURCELL, L. C.; QIAN, B.; RUANE, A. C.; SCHOVING, C.; SILVA, E. H. F. M.; SMITH, W.; SOLTANI, A.; SRIVASTAVA, A.; VIEIRA JÚNIOR, N. A.; SLONE, S.; SALMERÓN, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
KRITIKA KOTHARI, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; RAFAEL BATTISTI, UFG; KENNETH J. BOOTE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; SOTIRIOS V. ARCHONTOULIS, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY; ADRIANA CONFALONE, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES; JULIE CONSTANTIN, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE; SANTIAGO VIANNA CUADRA, CNPTIA; PHILIPPE DEBAEKE, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE; BABACAR FAYE, INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE D ́EVELOPPEMENT (IRD) ESPACE-DEV; BRIAN GRANT, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; GERRIT HOOGENBOOM, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; QI JING, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; MICHAEL VAN DER LAAN, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; FERNANDO ANTONIO MACENA DA SILVA, CPAC; FÁBIO RICARDO MARIN, ESALQ/USP; ALIREZA NEHBANDANI, GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCE; CLAAS NENDEL, University of PotsdaM, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape ResearcH; LARRY C. PURCELL, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS; BUDONG QIAN, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; ALEX C. RUANE, NASA GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES; CÉLINE SCHOVING, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE, TERRES INOVIA; EVANDRO H. F. M. SILVA, ESALQ/USP; WARD SMITH, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; AFSHIN SOLTANI, GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RE-SOURCES; AMIT SRIVASTAVA, UNIVERSITY OF BONN; NILSON A. VIEIRA JÚNIOR, ESALQ/USP; STACEY SLONE, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; MONTSERRAT SALMERÓN, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY. |
|
Título: |
Are soybean models ready for climate change food impact assessments? |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 135, 126482, Apr. 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126482 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield responses to temperature for some of the models. The high uncertainty in model responses indicates the limited applicability of individual models for climate change food projections. However, the ensemble mean of simulations across models was an effective tool to reduce the high uncertainty in soybean yield simulations associated with individual models and their parametrization. Ensemble, ensemble mean yield responses to temperature and [CO2] were similar to those reported from the literature. Our study is the first demonstration of the benefits achieved from using an ensemble of grain legume models for climate change food projections, and highlights that further soybean model development with experiments under elevated [CO2] and temperature is needed to reduce the uncertainty from the individual models. MenosAbstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield res... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
AgMIP; Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project; Impacto das mudanças climáticas; Legume model; Model calibration; Model ensemble; Modelos de soja; Temperature Atmospheric CO2 concentration. |
|
Thesagro: |
Glycine Max; Soja; Temperatura. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Models; Soybeans; Temperature. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232002/1/AP-Soybean-models-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04032naa a2200625 a 4500
001 2140426
005 2022-02-25
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126482$2DOI
100 1 $aKOTHARI, K.
245 $aAre soybean models ready for climate change food impact assessments?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aAbstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield responses to temperature for some of the models. The high uncertainty in model responses indicates the limited applicability of individual models for climate change food projections. However, the ensemble mean of simulations across models was an effective tool to reduce the high uncertainty in soybean yield simulations associated with individual models and their parametrization. Ensemble, ensemble mean yield responses to temperature and [CO2] were similar to those reported from the literature. Our study is the first demonstration of the benefits achieved from using an ensemble of grain legume models for climate change food projections, and highlights that further soybean model development with experiments under elevated [CO2] and temperature is needed to reduce the uncertainty from the individual models.
650 $aModels
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aTemperature
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aSoja
650 $aTemperatura
653 $aAgMIP
653 $aAgricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project
653 $aImpacto das mudanças climáticas
653 $aLegume model
653 $aModel calibration
653 $aModel ensemble
653 $aModelos de soja
653 $aTemperature Atmospheric CO2 concentration
700 1 $aBATTISTI, R.
700 1 $aBOOTE, K. J.
700 1 $aARCHONTOULIS, S. V.
700 1 $aCONFALONE, A.
700 1 $aCONSTANTIN, J.
700 1 $aCUADRA, S. V.
700 1 $aDEBAEKE, P.
700 1 $aFAYE, B.
700 1 $aGRANT, B.
700 1 $aHOOGENBOOM, G.
700 1 $aJING, Q.
700 1 $aVAN DER LAAN, M.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. A. M. da
700 1 $aMARIN, F. R.
700 1 $aNEHBANDANI, A.
700 1 $aNENDEL, C.
700 1 $aPURCELL, L. C.
700 1 $aQIAN, B.
700 1 $aRUANE, A. C.
700 1 $aSCHOVING, C.
700 1 $aSILVA, E. H. F. M.
700 1 $aSMITH, W.
700 1 $aSOLTANI, A.
700 1 $aSRIVASTAVA, A.
700 1 $aVIEIRA JÚNIOR, N. A.
700 1 $aSLONE, S.
700 1 $aSALMERÓN, M.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy$gv. 135, 126482, Apr. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
